New Delhi [India], June 11: The Principal District & Sessions Judge (West), Delhi, has stayed further proceedings in matters pending before the Court of the Learned JMFC-01, Tis Hazari Courts, after the applicants raised questions about how the cases had been pursued.
The applicants had approached the District Court for the transfer of multiple proceedings, taken either by or on behalf of Vikas Garg and companies in which he is interested. They had stated that the circumstances in which the proceedings had been taken had led to concerns about whether the matters could be taken on in full confidence and without prejudice in the Trial Court.
The applicants submitted that consolidation of proceedings would assist in efficient adjudication of the matters. The court has issued an interim order pending consideration of the transfer petitions
The applicants also cited how often the matters involving Vikas Garg and the associated companies had been listed before the Trial Court, which they had said created an apprehension. They asked for the transfer of matters in the interest of justice.
After the hearing of the submissions, the Principal District Court made a Notice, a summons to the Trial Court Record, and invited the presence and comments of the concerned Presiding Officer in a sealed cover. The Court stayed all further proceedings before the Trial Court till year come to the transfer petitions.
The interim order is being considered as a very good move, as it gives the District Court an opportunity to look into the concerns of the applicants before the cases are taken forward.
The applicants feeling that the order has given full weightage to their concerns and that they feel that the matter will be looked into in a fair manner said that the judicial process must be transparent, fair and provide equal opportunity to all parties involved.
The case is now listed for hearing before the Principal District & Sessions Judge (West), Delhi, 31 July 2026.
Disclaimer: This press release is based on information provided by the parties involved and publicly available court records. The contents reflect the claims, submissions, and positions of the concerned parties and should not be construed as findings of fact or conclusions on the merits of the case. The matter remains subject to judicial consideration, and all parties are presumed entitled to due process under law.
